From e68ed6d712067b9f9f274553890f91eb2662de5e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marc Khouzam Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 02:25:54 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] [249223] Better comment to explain that ResumeWithoutSignal is not complete. --- .../internal/ui/commands/GdbResumeWithoutSignalCommand.java | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/dsf-gdb/org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb.ui/src/org/eclipse/cdt/dsf/gdb/internal/ui/commands/GdbResumeWithoutSignalCommand.java b/dsf-gdb/org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb.ui/src/org/eclipse/cdt/dsf/gdb/internal/ui/commands/GdbResumeWithoutSignalCommand.java index 66d49dfb81c..ffb53868420 100644 --- a/dsf-gdb/org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb.ui/src/org/eclipse/cdt/dsf/gdb/internal/ui/commands/GdbResumeWithoutSignalCommand.java +++ b/dsf-gdb/org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb.ui/src/org/eclipse/cdt/dsf/gdb/internal/ui/commands/GdbResumeWithoutSignalCommand.java @@ -66,7 +66,10 @@ public class GdbResumeWithoutSignalCommand extends AbstractDebugCommand implemen IRunControl runControl = fTracker.getService(IRunControl.class); if (runControl != null) { - runControl.resume(dmc, rm); + // This call must be replaced by a new 'resumeWithoutSignal' or even better + // resumeWithSignal(0) which does not exist in the runControl service yet. + // But this method is currently disabled anyway, until proper support is available. + rm.done(); } else { rm.done(); }