1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/eclipse-cdt/cdt synced 2025-04-29 19:45:01 +02:00

Fix for Bug228706

This commit is contained in:
Francois Chouinard 2008-04-24 17:40:22 +00:00
parent 7fa8caa54f
commit bf9f5fbabd
5 changed files with 9 additions and 17 deletions

View file

@ -102,9 +102,9 @@ public class DsfMemoryBlockRetrieval extends PlatformObject implements IMemoryBl
// DSF stuff
fModelId = modelId;
// FIXME: Currently memory contexts are differentiated by sessionID
// so there is no way to guarantee the memory blocks will be reinstated
// in the correct memory space.
// FIXME: (Bug228573) Currently memory contexts are differentiated by
// sessionID so there is no way to guarantee the memory blocks will be
// reinstated in the correct memory space.
// Need a way to create deterministically the context ID from a unique
// target, ideally from the launch configuration (or derived from it).
// For the time being, just put some constant. This will work until we
@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ public class DsfMemoryBlockRetrieval extends PlatformObject implements IMemoryBl
}
// Process the block list specific to this memory context
// FIXME: We only process the first entry...
// FIXME: (Bug228573) We only process the first entry...
if (root.getAttribute(ATTR_EXPRESSION_LIST_CONTEXT).equals(fContextString)) {
List<IMemoryBlock> blocks = new ArrayList<IMemoryBlock>();
NodeList expressionList = root.getChildNodes();
@ -262,7 +262,8 @@ public class DsfMemoryBlockRetrieval extends PlatformObject implements IMemoryBl
}
}
// FIXME: Each retrieval overwrites the previous one :-(
// FIXME: (Bug228573) Each retrieval overwrites the previous one :-(
// In theory, we should make this a Job since we are writing to the file system.
// However, this would cause the same racing condition as Bug228308. Finally, we
// don't care too much about the UI responsiveness since we are in the process of

View file

@ -272,7 +272,6 @@ public class MIBreakpoints extends AbstractDsfService implements IBreakpoints
@DsfServiceEventHandler
public void eventDispatched(MIGDBExitEvent e) {
// TODO: Remove the installed breakpoints from the back-end
}
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

View file

@ -1186,7 +1186,7 @@ public class MIBreakpointsManager extends AbstractDsfService implements IBreakpo
// Identify the platform breakpoint
final ICBreakpoint breakpoint = findPlatformBreakpoint(number);
// FIXME: Temporary hack to have a context
// FIXME: (Bug228703) Temporary hack to have a context
Object[] contexts = fTargetBPs.keySet().toArray();
final IBreakpointsTargetDMContext context = (IBreakpointsTargetDMContext) contexts[0];
@ -1195,7 +1195,6 @@ public class MIBreakpointsManager extends AbstractDsfService implements IBreakpo
{ setSystem(true); }
@Override
protected IStatus run(IProgressMonitor monitor) {
// FIXME: Rename MyAdaptableType to something more relevant
fBreakpointActionManager.executeActions(breakpoint, new BreakpointActionAdapter(getExecutor(), getServicesTracker(), context));
return Status.OK_STATUS;
};
@ -1204,10 +1203,8 @@ public class MIBreakpointsManager extends AbstractDsfService implements IBreakpo
// Helper function to locate the platform breakpoint corresponding
// to the target breakpoint/watchpoint that was just hit
// FIXME: Need a way to identify the correct context where the BP was hit
// because it impacts the action (expression evaluation and resume delay).
// This means that the Breakpoint/WatchpointHitEvent will need to
// provide some extra info...
// FIXME: (Bug228703) Need a way to identify the correct context where the BP was hit
private ICBreakpoint findPlatformBreakpoint(int targetBreakpointID) {
Set<IBreakpointsTargetDMContext> targets = fTargetBPs.keySet();
for (IBreakpointsTargetDMContext target : targets) {

View file

@ -35,8 +35,6 @@ public class MILogActionEnabler implements ILogActionEnabler {
public MILogActionEnabler(DsfExecutor executor, DsfServicesTracker serviceTracker, IDMContext context) {
fExecutor = executor;
fServiceTracker = serviceTracker;
// FIXME: Although it looks optimistic, we know it works
// How can we guarantee that it always will?
fContext = (IBreakpointsTargetDMContext) context;
}

View file

@ -21,7 +21,6 @@ import org.eclipse.dd.dsf.service.DsfServicesTracker;
public class MIResumeActionEnabler implements IResumeActionEnabler {
@SuppressWarnings("unused")
private final DsfExecutor fExecutor;
private final DsfServicesTracker fServiceTracker;
private final IExecutionDMContext fContext;
@ -29,8 +28,6 @@ public class MIResumeActionEnabler implements IResumeActionEnabler {
public MIResumeActionEnabler(DsfExecutor executor, DsfServicesTracker serviceTracker, IDMContext context) {
fExecutor = executor;
fServiceTracker = serviceTracker;
// FIXME: Although it looks optimistic, we know it works
// How can we guarantee that it always will?
fContext = (IExecutionDMContext) context;
}