mirror of
https://github.com/eclipse-cdt/cdt
synced 2025-04-23 22:52:11 +02:00
Fixed processes test. Shouldn't create a process context based on PID=UNIQUE_GROUP_ID. Also, relax the test for the process name. With 7.0 we get the path information in the name; in 6.8 we don't. Just check that the executable simple file name is in there.
This commit is contained in:
parent
ef706515a9
commit
81a56f94b8
1 changed files with 51 additions and 20 deletions
|
@ -20,12 +20,14 @@ import java.util.regex.Pattern;
|
|||
|
||||
import org.eclipse.cdt.debug.core.ICDTLaunchConfigurationConstants;
|
||||
import org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.concurrent.DataRequestMonitor;
|
||||
import org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.concurrent.ThreadSafeAndProhibitedFromDsfExecutor;
|
||||
import org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.datamodel.DMContexts;
|
||||
import org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.datamodel.IDMContext;
|
||||
import org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.debug.service.IProcesses.IProcessDMContext;
|
||||
import org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.debug.service.IProcesses.IThreadDMContext;
|
||||
import org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.debug.service.IProcesses.IThreadDMData;
|
||||
import org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.gdb.service.command.IGDBControl;
|
||||
import org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.mi.service.IMIProcesses;
|
||||
import org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.mi.service.MIProcesses;
|
||||
import org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.service.DsfServicesTracker;
|
||||
import org.eclipse.cdt.dsf.service.DsfSession;
|
||||
import org.eclipse.cdt.tests.dsf.gdb.framework.AsyncCompletionWaitor;
|
||||
|
@ -91,6 +93,7 @@ public class GDBProcessesTest extends BaseTestCase {
|
|||
* Get the process data for the current program. Process is executable name in case of GDB back end
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public void getProcessData() throws InterruptedException{
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Create a request monitor
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
@ -109,12 +112,10 @@ public class GDBProcessesTest extends BaseTestCase {
|
|||
* Ask the service to get model data for the process.
|
||||
* There is only one process in case of GDB back end.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
final IProcessDMContext processContext = getProcessContext();
|
||||
fSession.getExecutor().submit(new Runnable() {
|
||||
public void run() {
|
||||
String groupId = MIProcesses.UNIQUE_GROUP_ID;
|
||||
|
||||
IProcessDMContext procDmc = fProcService.createProcessContext(fGdbCtrl.getContext(), groupId);
|
||||
fProcService.getExecutionData(procDmc, rm);
|
||||
fProcService.getExecutionData(processContext, rm);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -127,18 +128,11 @@ public class GDBProcessesTest extends BaseTestCase {
|
|||
Assert.assertTrue(fWait.getMessage(), fWait.isOK());
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Get process data
|
||||
* Get process data. Name of the process is the executable name in case of GDB back-end.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
IThreadDMData processData = (IThreadDMData)fWait.getReturnInfo();
|
||||
|
||||
if(processData == null)
|
||||
Assert.fail("No process data is returned for Process DMC");
|
||||
else{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Name of the process is the executable name in case of GDB back-end.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
assertEquals("Process data should be executable name " + EXEC_NAME, EXEC_NAME, processData.getName());
|
||||
}
|
||||
Assert.assertNotNull("No process data is returned for Process DMC", processData);
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue("Process data should be executable name " + EXEC_NAME, processData.getName().contains(EXEC_NAME));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -146,6 +140,7 @@ public class GDBProcessesTest extends BaseTestCase {
|
|||
*/
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void getThreadData() throws InterruptedException{
|
||||
|
||||
final String THREAD_ID = "1";
|
||||
final DataRequestMonitor<IThreadDMData> rm =
|
||||
new DataRequestMonitor<IThreadDMData>(fSession.getExecutor(), null) {
|
||||
|
@ -159,11 +154,10 @@ public class GDBProcessesTest extends BaseTestCase {
|
|||
};
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
final IProcessDMContext processContext = getProcessContext();
|
||||
fProcService.getExecutor().submit(new Runnable() {
|
||||
public void run() {
|
||||
String groupId = MIProcesses.UNIQUE_GROUP_ID;
|
||||
IProcessDMContext procDmc = fProcService.createProcessContext(fGdbCtrl.getContext(), groupId);
|
||||
IThreadDMContext threadDmc = fProcService.createThreadContext(procDmc, THREAD_ID);
|
||||
IThreadDMContext threadDmc = fProcService.createThreadContext(processContext, THREAD_ID);
|
||||
fProcService.getExecutionData(threadDmc, rm);
|
||||
}
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
@ -182,4 +176,41 @@ public class GDBProcessesTest extends BaseTestCase {
|
|||
|
||||
fWait.waitReset();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Utility method to return the process DM context. These tests launch a
|
||||
* single process, thus only one such context is available.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* <p>
|
||||
* This must not be called from the DSF executor.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @return the process context
|
||||
* @throws InterruptedException
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ThreadSafeAndProhibitedFromDsfExecutor("fSession.getExecutor()")
|
||||
private IProcessDMContext getProcessContext() throws InterruptedException {
|
||||
assert !fSession.getExecutor().isInExecutorThread();
|
||||
|
||||
final AsyncCompletionWaitor waitor = new AsyncCompletionWaitor();
|
||||
|
||||
fProcService.getProcessesBeingDebugged(fGdbCtrl.getContext(), new DataRequestMonitor<IDMContext[]>(fSession.getExecutor(), null) {
|
||||
@Override
|
||||
protected void handleCompleted() {
|
||||
if (isSuccess()) {
|
||||
IDMContext[] contexts = getData();
|
||||
Assert.assertNotNull("invalid return value from service", contexts);
|
||||
Assert.assertEquals("unexpected number of processes", contexts.length, 1);
|
||||
IDMContext context = contexts[0];
|
||||
IProcessDMContext processContext = DMContexts.getAncestorOfType(context, IProcessDMContext.class);
|
||||
Assert.assertNotNull("unexpected process context type ", processContext);
|
||||
waitor.setReturnInfo(processContext);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
waitor.waitUntilDone(TestsPlugin.massageTimeout(2000));
|
||||
Assert.assertTrue(fWait.getMessage(), fWait.isOK());
|
||||
return (IProcessDMContext) waitor.getReturnInfo();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue