From 65a29165c20d6a4546853eee11fd88eafb2250f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: sprigogin <eclipse.sprigogin@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 20:56:22 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Bug 370146 - No references in class defined in file
 containing inactive code that references a macro

---
 .../cdt/internal/core/parser/scanner/ScannerContext.java     | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/core/org.eclipse.cdt.core/parser/org/eclipse/cdt/internal/core/parser/scanner/ScannerContext.java b/core/org.eclipse.cdt.core/parser/org/eclipse/cdt/internal/core/parser/scanner/ScannerContext.java
index 5014289a94d..6a5a8a8431e 100644
--- a/core/org.eclipse.cdt.core/parser/org/eclipse/cdt/internal/core/parser/scanner/ScannerContext.java
+++ b/core/org.eclipse.cdt.core/parser/org/eclipse/cdt/internal/core/parser/scanner/ScannerContext.java
@@ -347,6 +347,11 @@ final class ScannerContext {
 	}
 
 	public void significantMacro(IMacroBinding macro) {
+		if (fCurrentState == CodeState.eParseInactive) {
+			// Macros in inactive code should not be considered significant to match behavior of indexer,
+			// which doesn't parse inactive code (see http://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=370146).
+			return;
+		}
 		final char[] macroName= macro.getNameCharArray();
 		if (fInternalModifications != null && !fInternalModifications.containsKey(macroName)) {
 			final char[] expansion = macro.getExpansion();